Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional, Glass Powder, and Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete and Mortar

dc.contributor.author	Mohan Jiang
dc.contributor.author	Xiaoju Chen
dc.contributor.author	Farshad Rajabipour
dc.contributor.author	Chris T. Hendrickson
dc.date.accessioned	2017-05-08T22:06:22Z
dc.date.available	2017-05-08T22:06:22Z
dc.date.copyright	December 2014
dc.date.issued	2014
dc.identifier.other	28224830.pdf
dc.identifier.uri	http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/71460
dc.description.abstract	This study compares the cradle-to-gate greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), energy use, water use, and potential environmental toxicity of conventional (Conv), glass powder (GP), and alkali-activated slag (AAS) concrete and mortar. The comparison is based on
dc.publisher	American Society of Civil Engineers
dc.title	Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional, Glass Powder, and Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete and Mortar
dc.type	Journal Paper
dc.journal.volume	20
dc.journal.issue	4
dc.journal.title	Journal of Infrastructure Systems
dc.identifier.doi	10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000211
dc.tree	Journal of Infrastructure Systems:;2014:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttype	Fulltext