Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKyung-Duck
dc.contributor.authorSuh
dc.contributor.authorMinsuek
dc.contributor.authorKim
dc.contributor.authorSeung-Woo
dc.contributor.authorKim
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T22:04:19Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T22:04:19Z
dc.date.copyrightJuly 2013
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.other%28asce%29ww%2E1943-5460%2E0000229.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/70466
dc.description.abstractIn the probabilistic design of a breakwater armor layer, it is often necessary to calculate the damage accumulated over the breakwater's life cycle. In this paper, a comparison is made between existing methods to calculate the cumulative damage to the breakwater armor layer. In the current study, hydraulic experiments are conducted to gauge the damage progression of Tetrapod armor units. When severe damage occurs at the beginning of the breakwater's life cycle, the two methods do not differ significantly, but, in general, the latter predicts a larger cumulative damage than the former. For a Tetrapod armor layer, it is recommended that the average of the two methods be used.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleComparison of Calculation Methods of Cumulative Damage to Breakwater Armor Layer
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume139
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000181
dc.treeJournal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record