Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNobuhisa
dc.contributor.authorKobayashi
dc.contributor.authorHooyoung
dc.contributor.authorJung
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T22:04:12Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T22:04:12Z
dc.date.copyrightNovember 2012
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.other%28asce%29ww%2E1943-5460%2E0000193.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/70428
dc.description.abstractOur capability for predicting beach and dune erosion has improved in the last three decades, but the recovery of an eroded beach above the mean sea level (MSL) cannot be predicted at present. The cycle of beach erosion and recovery will need to be predicted for the long-term maintenance of a sand beach with a dune for coastal flooding reduction. The cross-shore numerical model (CSHORE) is extended and evaluated using natural beach erosion and recovery data along 16 cross-shore lines spanning 5 km alongshore for the duration of 272 days. The CSHORE predicts beach and dune erosion fairly well, as has been shown in previous comparisons. The bed-load formula used in the CSHORE is adjusted to predict the accreted beach profile with a berm. The computed beach profile evolutions are shown to be affected little by the alongshore gradient of the longshore sediment transport rate along the straight beach. The extended CSHORE predicts both erosion and accretion above MSL within a factor of about 2.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleBeach Erosion and Recovery
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume138
dc.journal.issue6
dc.journal.titleJournal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000147
dc.treeJournal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 006
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record