| dc.contributor.author | Tomás Soler | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jen-Yu Han | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dru Smith | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-08T22:01:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-08T22:01:20Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | May 2012 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.identifier.other | %28asce%29su%2E1943-5428%2E0000114.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/68946 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The objective of this case study is to evaluate the different approximations in the technical literature that are used to compute the variance-covariance matrix of local accuracies. This analysis compares the rigor and validity of the four most common mathematical formulations that are used for computing the variance-covariance matrix of local accuracies, as determined from the original global Cartesian variance-covariance matrix | |
| dc.publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| dc.title | Local Accuracies | |
| dc.type | Journal Paper | |
| dc.journal.volume | 138 | |
| dc.journal.issue | 2 | |
| dc.journal.title | Journal of Surveying Engineering | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000069 | |
| dc.tree | Journal of Surveying Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 002 | |
| dc.contenttype | Fulltext | |
