Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPhilip Berke
dc.contributor.authorGavin Smith
dc.contributor.authorWard Lyles
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:57:38Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:57:38Z
dc.date.copyrightMay 2012
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.other%28asce%29nh%2E1527-6996%2E0000105.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/67461
dc.description.abstractState mitigation plans play a critical role in supporting disaster loss reduction and long-term resiliency of human communities. The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires all states to prepare mitigation plans. Based on six principles of plan quality, we content analyzed a sample of 30 coastal state plans to determine how well they support mitigation. Findings indicate that although plans scored moderate to low for all plan quality principles, plan quality has modestly improved over the past decade. In addition, some states scored low for one principle, which can undermine implementation of otherwise high-scoring plans for the remaining principles. Recommendations are offered on how plan quality evaluation can be used to guide and monitor state development of hazard mitigation plans.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titlePlanning for Resiliency: Evaluation of State Hazard Mitigation Plans under the Disaster Mitigation Act
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume13
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleNatural Hazards Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000063
dc.treeNatural Hazards Review:;2012:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record