Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYacov Y. Haimes
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:22Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:54:22Z
dc.date.copyrightOctober 2012
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.other%28asce%29lm%2E1943-5630%2E0000220.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66014
dc.description.abstractThis article posits that the complex technical, organizational, and communication process associated with preparedness for, response to, and recovery from natural and human-made disasters is harmonious and synonymous with the process of risk assessment, management, and communication. Modelers of these processes must recognize that the states of the system, whether of the affected infrastructures or of the communities, constitute essential building blocks of the constructed models. The physical states of all infrastructures and the states of well-being of all communities are functions of time; thus, the time frame in modeling, as well as in preparedness and in risk analysis, is of paramount importance. Furthermore, the vulnerability and resilience of a system (physical or natural) to a specific threat (initiating event) are manifestations of the states of the system. This implies that the risk to a targeted system from a specific threat is a function of the states, the vulnerability, the resilience of the system, the time frame, and the specific threat. The term
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleSystems-Based Approach to Preparedness for, Response to, and Recovery from Natural and Human-Made Disasters
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume12
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleLeadership and Management in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000183
dc.treeLeadership and Management in Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record