Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVincent Sabourin
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:18Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:54:18Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 2012
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.other%28asce%29lm%2E1943-5630%2E0000200.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65997
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the research described in this paper was to ascertain the obstacles engineering managers face in executing organizational objectives, to identify differences between engineering managers and managers in general in the obstacles they face, and to map clusters of obstacles. The author conducted a survey of 26 engineering managers in a Canadian engineering company employing about 250 engineers and compared the results with a database of 322 managers in general. The study examined obstacles corresponding to five drivers of performance: rules, emotions, initiative, immediate action, and integrity. In contrast with managers in general, engineering managers faced a greater need to clarify rules, a greater lack of initiative among their employees, and less difficulty in taking immediate action. For the drivers of emotions and integrity, there were no significant differences between the engineering managers and managers in general. The obstacles the engineering managers faced when executing their management strategy could be clustered in five groups.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleThrough the Lenses of Strategy Execution: Obstacles in Engineering Management
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume12
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleLeadership and Management in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000165
dc.treeLeadership and Management in Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record