Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGordon Culp
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:17Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:54:17Z
dc.date.copyrightJuly 2011
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.other%28asce%29lm%2E1943-5630%2E0000176.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65975
dc.description.abstractAre there alternative methods for delivering water and wastewater treatment projects that can save time and money without sacrificing project quality? This is an especially relevant question in these difficult economic times. This paper addresses the question by comparing traditional and alternative project delivery methods in terms of their effects on project quality, schedule, and costs. Project delivery methods discussed are traditional design–bid–build and the alternative methods of design–build, design–build–operate, and design–build–finance–operate.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleAlternative Project Delivery Methods for Water and Wastewater Projects: Do They Save Time and Money?
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume11
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleLeadership and Management in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000133
dc.treeLeadership and Management in Engineering:;2011:;Volume ( 011 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record