Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCharles Edward Williams, Jr.
dc.contributor.authorPhilip W. Johnson
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:43:03Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:43:03Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 2014
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.other%28asce%29em%2E1943-7889%2E0000003.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/60448
dc.description.abstractThis article is the result of continued research at the University of Alabama’s Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering relating to management issues in engineering failures. The research shows that many failures occur due to well-known technical issues overlooked by management during the design process. Such failures are often termed errors and omissions. This research further indicates that systematic design quality control and quality assurance, careful communication, and post-design inspection are management techniques that could prevent a large number of engineering failures. In an effort to decrease the incidence of management issues, the authors propose to structure a prototypical standard of professional practice for design management. In developing that structure, the authors (1) explored the nature of standards and the similarities that exist in definitions by various professional organizations and (2) reviewed the standard of care and considered why it may not be the engineering profession’s best resource for evaluating duties and practices.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleStandards of Professional Practice for Design Management
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume140
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000190
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2014:;Volume ( 140 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record