Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorElizabeth Gadd
dc.contributor.authorAndrew Baldwin
dc.contributor.authorMichael Norris
dc.contributor.authorSharon Reid
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:42:51Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:42:51Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 2012
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.other%28asce%29ei%2E1943-5541%2E0000088.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/60336
dc.description.abstractLecturers and students in the Civil and Building Engineering Dept. at Loughborough Univ. were surveyed to gain an understanding of how they expected the literature review element of final year projects to be undertaken. The results showed a disparity in the number and type of resources expected to be used; in the problems they anticipated when undertaking a literature review; and in the confidence levels students had in the use of information tools. Recommendations are made to improve the teaching of the literature review
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleUsing the Evidence: Comparison of Civil and Building Lecturers’ and Students’ Approaches to the Literature Review
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume138
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000077
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record