Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDaniel S. Cohan
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:42:48Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:42:48Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 2011
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.other%28asce%29ei%2E1943-5541%2E0000055.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/60306
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the pedagogical development of an undergraduate course in energy and the environment at Rice University and the crucial role of comparative metrics in its curriculum. The course, aimed at undergraduate engineering and science majors, overviews the physical principles that constrain energy use and explores how various sectors and fuels affect Earth’s environment and climate. The curriculum emphasizes the application of objective metrics for comparing the cost, energy intensity, and environmental impacts of various energy sources. Such metrics provide alternate approaches for assessing the relative merits of energy options but are neglected in most undergraduate textbooks. Thus, the course relies on assignments derived from supplemental readings to prompt students to compute comparative metrics and critically assess the approaches taken by energy researchers. A term project engages student teams in designing and evaluating original proposals for improving the use of an energy source from the perspective of a scientist, businessperson, or policymaker.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleEnergy and Environment Undergraduate Course Emphasizing Comparative Metrics
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume137
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000045
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2011:;Volume ( 137 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record