• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Statistical Distribution of Bridge Resistance Using Updated Material Parameters

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28asce%29be%2E1943-5592%2E0000280.pdf (702.2Kb)
    Date
    2012
    Author
    Sarah L. Orton
    Oh-Sung Kwon
    Timothy Hazlett
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Resistance (load-carrying capacity) of a bridge girder is a random variable and can be determined by considering the uncertainty in material, fabrication, and professional/analysis properties. Previous calibrations of load and resistance factor design (LRFD) determined the distribution of bridge resistance on the basis of data from more than 30 years ago. This study uses the latest Material properties available in, the literature to update the resistance distribution. The statistical distribution of the resistance was determined through Monte Carlo simulation. The results of the analysis show an increase in bias and a decrease in the coefficient of variation (COV) for all types of bridges in comparison with those used in previous calibration studies. The changes in bias and COV are the result of higher bias and lower COV in material properties owing to better quality control in concrete and steel manufacturing. Steel and concrete bridges saw the greatest change in resistance distribution. Prestressed bridges saw little change because the material properties of prestressing steel, which is the most sensitive parameter in the prestressed bridges, did not change significantly since the previous calibration study. With these resistance distributions, it is expected that the calibration of the load factor in the AASHTO specification will lead to a lower live load factor, thereby possibly reducing the material cost of the bridge. In addition, the ratio of actual to required (design) resistances of representative bridges in Missouri was determined. The analysis showed that almost all representative bridges had a capacity-to-demand ratio greater than 1 according to current AASHTO standards.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56821
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV