• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Evaluation of AASHTO-LRFD Design Methods for Thermal Loads in Fixed-Flexible Twin-Walled R/C Bridge Piers

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28asce%29be%2E1943-5592%2E0000242.pdf (1.182Mb)
    Date
    2011
    Author
    Arturo E. Schultz
    Christopher J. Scheevel
    Krista M. Morris
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The design of reinforced concrete fixed-flexible twin-walled bridge piers for lateral loads is an ambiguously defined task for bridge engineers. As the bridge experiences lateral loads, primarily from temperature fluctuations and time-dependent effects, the walls undergo cracking, requiring designers to consider sectional stiffness reductions. Two types of finite-element models were generated of the recently constructed Wakota Bridge in South St. Paul, Minnesota, one using a design-level program (SAP2000) and the other using a research-level program (ABAQUS). For an arbitrary temperature load, a commonly used refined design method, implemented in the design-level program, was evaluated for accuracy of reduced section properties relative to a more descriptive progressive cracking solution provided by the research model. The refined design method with four stiffness update segments was found to provide a balance between accuracy and analysis effort. A staged construction model of the Wakota Bridge, defined in SAP2000 to incorporate time-dependent effects of the construction sequence, indicated that pier forces for the design options in the AASHTO-LRFD Specifications for simulating reduced section properties (i.e., refined analysis with stiffness updates versus gross sections with reduced load factors) correlated to within approximately 10%. Additionally, of the two temperature change procedures in the AASHTO-LRFD Specifications, Procedure B produced moments for the Wakota Bridge that were as much as 25% larger than those from Procedure A.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56779
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV