Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrian P.
dc.contributor.authorMalone
dc.contributor.authorThomas H.
dc.contributor.authorMiller
dc.contributor.authorRakesh
dc.contributor.authorGupta
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:33:35Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:33:35Z
dc.date.copyrightDecember 2014
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.other%28asce%29ae%2E1943-5568%2E0000136.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56138
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to compare structural load path and system behavior of a light-frame (LF) and a timber frame (TF) structure. This load path analysis is part of a broader research effort that compares LF to TF residential structures. Structural analysis software was used to create a model of each structure. The TF structure was composed of large-dimension timbers and structural insulated panels (SIPs). An equivalent LF structure was designed for comparison, following the guidelines of the International Residential Code. Results show that TF outperforms LF in resisting uplift, as well as in story drift. TF also provides load paths that are more resistant to the introduction of large openings and the loss of a central post. Observed axial loads in TF posts show smaller ranges compared with LF studs.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleGravity and Wind Load Path Analysis of a Light-Frame and a Traditional Timber Frame Building
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume20
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000136
dc.treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record