Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSivanerupan
dc.contributor.authorJ. L.
dc.contributor.authorWilson
dc.contributor.authorE. F.
dc.contributor.authorGad
dc.contributor.authorN. T. K.
dc.contributor.authorLam
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:33:35Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:33:35Z
dc.date.copyrightMarch 2014
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.other%28asce%29ae%2E1943-5568%2E0000130.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56132
dc.description.abstractThe point fixed glass facade system (PFGFS), also known as a spider glass system, is popular because it is the most transparent facade system available for buildings. The glass facade system is fixed to the support structure at minimal points using bolts and spider arms. Generally, the racking performance of these systems is not considered at the design stage. The facade system will be vulnerable to racking actions mainly during severe earthquakes and wind actions if the system does not have sufficient in-plane drift capacity. A unique real-scale in-plane racking laboratory test on a typical PFGFS was conducted to assess the in-plane racking performance. A maximum drift of 2.1% was measured, which was much larger than initially anticipated because of the rigid-body articulation of the system and higher than typical maximum allowable interstory drift for buildings in regions of lower seismicity. A sophisticated nonlinear finite-element (FE) model was developed and conservatively benchmarked against the experimental results with excellent correlation. The FE analyses showed that a significant amount of the drift capacity was attributed to the rigid-body translation at the built-in oversize holes for construction tolerances provided in the facade system connections. In this paper, the laboratory test setup and experimental results are discussed together with the confirmatory FE analysis results.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleIn-Plane Drift Capacity of Contemporary Point Fixed Glass Facade Systems
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume20
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000130
dc.treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record