Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKa Wah (Calvin) Chui
dc.contributor.authorYong Bai
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:33:25Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:33:25Z
dc.date.copyrightDecember 2010
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.other%28asce%29ae%2E1943-5568%2E0000020.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56022
dc.description.abstractIn light of the fact that construction projects are expensive, complex, and time-consuming undertakings, a well-written contract that specifies each participant’s duties and obligations is required. Furthermore, a well-written contract with regard to business practice differences between the United States and China is unquestionably needed by American owners, design firms, and construction companies conducting business in China. In response to this industry need, general conditions of construction contracts commonly used in the United States (AIA-A201) and China (GF-1999-0201) have been analyzed and compared. The findings of this research reveal that the content of subclauses in AIA-A201 and GF-1999-0201 is different in several ways. These differences may have been caused by cultural, historical, geographical, political, and language variations that exist between the American and Chinese construction markets. Understanding these differences could help U.S. companies stay competitive and profitable in China.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleComparison of Contract General Conditions between United States and China
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume16
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000020
dc.treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record