Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVictor Gane
dc.contributor.authorJohn Haymaker
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:33:24Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:33:24Z
dc.date.copyrightSeptember 2010
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.other%28asce%29ae%2E1943-5568%2E0000017.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56018
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an analysis of current conceptual design processes for high-rise buildings. We synthesize a method to document and measure these processes and use it to analyze data from several case studies and a survey of leading architectural and engineering design firms. We describe current high-rise conceptual design process in terms of the following: design team size, composition, and time investment; clarity of goal definition; number and range of design options generated; number and type of model-based analyses performed; and the criteria used for decision making. We identify several potential weaknesses in current design processes including lack of clarity in goal definition and a low quantity of generated and analyzed options. We argue that potentially higher performing designs are being left unconsidered and discuss the potential reasons and costs.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleBenchmarking Current Conceptual High-Rise Design Processes
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume16
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000017
dc.treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record