Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmarjit Singh
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:32:35Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:32:35Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 2009
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291532-6748%282009%299%3A1%289%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55498
dc.description.abstractWhat should the world do about global warming and air pollution as a result of burning fossil fuels? The argument isn’t about whether global warming exists or not, but rather what really causes it. There is no doubt that burning fossil fuels and automobile emissions adversely affect the health of humans, animals, and birds. We have seen that solar cycles might be entering a significant stage, such that even if we stopped burning fossil fuels, global warming would likely continue apace. Hydrogen fuel cells will actually contribute to global warming because water vapor emissions are a greenhouse gas. The planet and humankind will, nevertheless, survive a warming onslaught. But, air pollution is a bigger disaster caused by the burning of fossil fuels that may irreversibly affect (or mutate) humans. I argue that nuclear energy is the choice of last resort that has to be activated now. Nuclear energy costs are comparable to costs for energy from coal and fossil fuels.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleThe Future of Energy
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume9
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleLeadership and Management in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2009)9:1(9)
dc.treeLeadership and Management in Engineering:;2009:;Volume ( 009 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record