Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSara Metcalf
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:32:32Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:32:32Z
dc.date.copyrightOctober 2008
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291532-6748%282008%298%3A4%28255%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55478
dc.description.abstractWhen public and private stakeholders gather to address a shared concern, they implicitly or explicitly bound the problem in geographic space. Implicit bounding involves identifying the problem and then considering the spatial ramifications. Explicit bounding may be invoked by governing agencies of a metropolitan region. These implicit or explicit boundaries of concern are evident in recent discourse about the post-Katrina impact on communities in the New Orleans area. Analysis of such discourse reveals differences of understanding that result from individual experience as well as social influences. Individual affiliations with social institutions such as nonprofits, local governments, industry, and agriculture implicitly shape the boundaries of concern for shared land and water resources allocated in regional infrastructure decisions.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleModeling Boundaries of Concern among Conflicting Stakeholders
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume8
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleLeadership and Management in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2008)8:4(255)
dc.treeLeadership and Management in Engineering:;2008:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record