Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThomas Sputo
dc.contributor.authorKimberly Lammert
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:32:30Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:32:30Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 2008
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291532-6748%282008%298%3A2%2849%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55449
dc.description.abstractStructural engineering is both an art and applied science. Traditionally, students of structural engineering were exposed to the art along with the science of the profession by teachers who themselves were practitioners of that art. Over the past thirty years, the art of structural engineering has been almost completely replaced by science, which many times is performed for its own sake. This growing emphasis on “studying” rather than “creating” is leading to a crisis in the structural engineering profession. This paper makes a case for reform by reviving art and practice in structural engineering education, and calls for separation of structural engineering education from general civil engineering undergraduate programs.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleReviving Art and Practice in Structural Engineering Education
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume8
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleLeadership and Management in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2008)8:2(49)
dc.treeLeadership and Management in Engineering:;2008:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record