Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLee L. Anderson Jr.
dc.contributor.authorRobert D. Douglass
dc.contributor.authorBrian C. Kaub
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:32:25Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:32:25Z
dc.date.copyrightJuly 2006
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291532-6748%282006%296%3A3%28110%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55395
dc.description.abstractThis article describes how partnering works on the Woodrow Wilson Bridge (WWB) project. At the 50-percent point in construction, this $2.4 billion megaproject is on schedule and on budget. One of the key factors contributing to this achievement has been the partnering system used, which recognizes common interests, provides for disciplined communication, and measures team effectiveness. The time and place for identifying common interests on the project is at the initial partnering kickoff workshop. Five specific lessons learned in the course of conducting ten workshops are described in the article. Every month, or every other month, each partnering team then meets again to reassess its performance and confront the issues that have arisen. One important characteristic of every periodic WWB partnering meeting is the cheering section at the end. Telling everybody what went
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleAnatomy of a Successful Partnering Program on a Megaproject
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume6
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleLeadership and Management in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2006)6:3(110)
dc.treeLeadership and Management in Engineering:;2006:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record