Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKathleen M. J. Harmon
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:32:23Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:32:23Z
dc.date.copyrightOctober 2004
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291532-6748%282004%294%3A4%28148%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55371
dc.description.abstractArbitration is evolving from a swift, cost-effective alternative dispute resolution mechanism to a slow, laborious process akin to litigation in terms of procedure and costs without the safeguards of litigation. By use of several unique techniques to reduce the time and costs, the original virtues of arbitration can be restored, while maintaining the integrity of the process and its inherent procedural fairness. This article details several suggestions on how, with some forethought and planning, cost and time reductions can be enacted without sacrificing the main tenet of the arbitration process, namely, a fair, swift, and cost-effective dispute resolution process.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleCost-Effective Strategies for Arbitration
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume4
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleLeadership and Management in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2004)4:4(148)
dc.treeLeadership and Management in Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 004 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record