Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRon Shumway
dc.contributor.authorAlan Richard
dc.contributor.authorJosh Ritti
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:32:22Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:32:22Z
dc.date.copyrightJuly 2004
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291532-6748%282004%294%3A3%2899%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55366
dc.description.abstractPart II of “New Trends and Bad Results in Construction Contracting” offers a review of a few “problem” trends that increasingly appear in the construction industry, including differing site conditions clauses that shift risks to the contractor; consequential damages clauses that could take away the contractor’s profit and more; clauses that promise alternative dispute resolution that instead set up roadblocks and hurdles that delay resolution and increase the cost of settling disputes; and clauses that give away the contractor’s claims and rights to lien the job from the outset. The pressures leading to these trends are primarily economic and have resulted in (among other things) more risk for the contractor. This paper discusses areas of increased risk found in today’s construction contracts, the reasons why they have appeared and what a contractor should do to mitigate these “new” risks.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleNew Trends and Bad Results in Construction Contracts, Part II
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume4
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleLeadership and Management in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2004)4:3(99)
dc.treeLeadership and Management in Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 004 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record