Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLee L. Anderson, Jr.
dc.contributor.authorJames K. Brookshire
dc.contributor.authorPaul J. Gudelski
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:32:21Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:32:21Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 2004
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291532-6748%282004%294%3A1%2838%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55354
dc.description.abstractThe foundations contract for replacement of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge near Washington, D.C., presented an opportunity to profit from partnering. This article tells why partnering was necessary, the techniques used, and some payoffs. The contract had disincentive payments, potential for differing site conditions, community constraints, and untested relationships. Regular meetings and a monthly questionnaire facilitated partnering, trends and comments were analyzed monthly to keep on track, and both parties went beyond contract requirements to succeed. Partnering belongs in any major acquisition program’s toolkit.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleA Partnering Success Story at the Woodrow Wilson Bridge
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume4
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleLeadership and Management in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2004)4:1(38)
dc.treeLeadership and Management in Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 004 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record