| dc.contributor.author | Chris Yarnell | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:32:21Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-08T21:32:21Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | January 2004 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
| dc.identifier.other | %28asce%291532-6748%282004%294%3A1%2814%29.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55349 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The paper presents a view of the benefits and drawbacks of applying GASB Statement No. 34 in a small municipal entity. Cole County, Missouri, is taking the requirement and using it to improve the long-term operations of the county to the benefit of the taxpayers. The county chose to use GASB 34’s modified reporting method, which, despite the effort required to maintain a database on the condition of the county’s infrastructure, can be used to justify maintenance costs. This is a cost-effective way to maintain a locality’s assets. If the infrastructure assets can be maintained in a predetermined condition, the need for deferred maintenance will decrease, and thus the life-cycle cost for the whole network will decrease. | |
| dc.publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| dc.title | Asset Management, GASB 34, and the Local Entity Perspective | |
| dc.type | Journal Paper | |
| dc.journal.volume | 4 | |
| dc.journal.issue | 1 | |
| dc.journal.title | Leadership and Management in Engineering | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2004)4:1(14) | |
| dc.tree | Leadership and Management in Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 004 ):;issue: 001 | |
| dc.contenttype | Fulltext | |