Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNicole Dash
dc.contributor.authorHugh Gladwin
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:31:31Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:31:31Z
dc.date.copyrightAugust 2007
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291527-6988%282007%298%3A3%2869%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/54811
dc.description.abstractResearchers have examined a wide range of factors that affect evacuation decisions after people hear hurricane forecasts and other information. This review of the literature focuses on three broad areas of research that often overlap: warning, risk perception, and evacuation research. Whereas it is challenging to demarcate the literature along these lines, we believe each of these areas represents important dimensions of evacuation decision making. The literature on warning focuses to varying degrees on warning as a social process, rather than a simple result of hearing official warnings. Warnings by themselves do not motivate evacuation—people must perceive risk. The extensive literature on objective and subjective processes in risk perception has to be evaluated. The review concludes with a focus on some important work in modeling evacuation and evacuation decision-making. Finally, we present recommendations for future research that draws on the strength of earlier work while focusing more directly on risk, the information included in hurricane forecasts, and the timing of those forecasts.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleEvacuation Decision Making and Behavioral Responses: Individual and Household
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume8
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleNatural Hazards Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:3(69)
dc.treeNatural Hazards Review:;2007:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record