Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCraig Taylor
dc.contributor.authorErik VanMarcke
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:31:30Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:31:30Z
dc.date.copyrightAugust 2006
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291527-6988%282006%297%3A3%28131%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/54796
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we employ the metaphors of the hedgehog and the fox, as elaborated by Isaiah Berlin and recently employed by Philip Tetlock, in order to contrast two opposite but complementary approaches to infrastructure risk management. We summarize how a combined hedgehog and fox strategy is in evidence in two peer-reviewed monographs recently published by ASCE, as well how additional activities such as those by the American Lifelines Alliance have deployed this combined strategy. We provide plausible reasons why a combined hedgehog and fox strategy can be more successful in reducing risks in civil infrastructure systems than either an exclusively hedgehog or an exclusively fox strategy.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleHedgehog and Fox Strategies for Reducing Risks in Infrastructure Systems
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume7
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleNatural Hazards Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:3(131)
dc.treeNatural Hazards Review:;2006:;Volume ( 007 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record