Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaori Yoshida
dc.contributor.authorRobert E. Deyle
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:31:24Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:31:24Z
dc.date.copyrightFebruary 2005
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291527-6988%282005%296%3A1%281%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/54756
dc.description.abstractSmall businesses are a significant component of local economies, yet previous studies have shown that many small businesses are vulnerable to natural disasters and ill prepared for recovery. If effective programs are to be developed to help reduce the vulnerability of small businesses, a better understanding is needed of the factors that determine when and why small businesses do or do not take mitigation initiatives. This paper reports the results of quantitative analyses of survey data from 230 small businesses in Duval County, Fla. We analyzed three hazard mitigation initiatives: business continuity planning, structural hazard mitigation, and insurance purchase. Common determinants of the three types of mitigation activities include (1) access to expertise, (2) type of business, and (3) perceived exposure of the business location to natural hazards. Recommendations are offered for the content and focus of small business hazard mitigation outreach products and programs provided by local government agencies and for initiatives to support such efforts that can be provided by federal and state agencies.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleDeterminants of Small Business Hazard Mitigation
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume6
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleNatural Hazards Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:1(1)
dc.treeNatural Hazards Review:;2005:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record