Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKim M. Carsell
dc.contributor.authorNathan D. Pingel
dc.contributor.authorDavid T. Ford
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:31:24Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:31:24Z
dc.date.copyrightAugust 2004
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291527-6988%282004%295%3A3%28131%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/54746
dc.description.abstractA flood warning system yields direct and indirect, tangible and intangible benefits. To achieve this, the system includes hardware, software, plans and procedures, and personnel that work in an integrated manner to increase the mitigation time available prior to the onset of flooding. This mitigation time increase is a consequence of a reduction in the time required to collect data, to evaluate and identify the flood threat, to notify emergency personnel and the public, and to make decisions about the appropriate response. The direct tangible benefit—the inundation damage reduction—can be computed with standard expected damage computation procedures, using modified depth-damage functions that include mitigation time as an independent variable and accounting for improvements to the efficiency of response due to the implementation of the flood warning system. This proposed method is applicable for benefit evaluation for any flood warning system; it is illustrated here with an example from the Sacramento River basin of central California.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleQuantifying the Benefit of a Flood Warning System
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume5
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleNatural Hazards Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2004)5:3(131)
dc.treeNatural Hazards Review:;2004:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record