Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThomas A. Birkland
dc.contributor.authorRaymond J. Burby
dc.contributor.authorDavid Conrad
dc.contributor.authorHanna Cortner
dc.contributor.authorWilliam K. Michener
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:31:20Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:31:20Z
dc.date.copyrightFebruary 2003
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291527-6988%282003%294%3A1%2846%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/54697
dc.description.abstractFlooding remains the most common and one of the most costly categories of natural hazards in the United States. Historically, the United States has relied on structural mitigation, insurance, and disaster relief to mitigate the harm done by floods. However, experience has shown that structural mitigation and related policies can fail to protect lives and property while also contributing to the degradation of the riverine environment. We review flood hazard mitigation policy, describe some of the environmental damage associated with current policies, and review current policy proposals to outline ways to mitigate the flood hazard without promoting catastrophic losses and environmental damage.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleRiver Ecology and Flood Hazard Mitigation
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume4
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleNatural Hazards Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:1(46)
dc.treeNatural Hazards Review:;2003:;Volume ( 004 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record