Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliam J. Hall
dc.contributor.authorJohn H. Wiggins
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:31:16Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:31:16Z
dc.date.copyrightAugust 2000
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291527-6988%282000%291%3A3%28180%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/54634
dc.description.abstractFrom time to time, in designing or assessing the adequacy of facilities to withstand the damaging effects of natural hazards, it is appropriate to reexamine the topic of acceptable risk. This paper has been prepared in the spirit of addressing that topic, albeit generally and briefly. The writers summarize broadly many of the elements that typically go into the making of an assessment of risk, irrespective of the type of applicable natural hazard (earthquake, tornado, high wind, landslides, flood, etc.). Based on their experience, the writers have chosen to focus their attention on the factors that enter into a fundamental assessment of one hazard only, seismic risk, in turn directed to supporting judgment regarding acceptable risk. Similar procedures would be followed for other natural hazards regarded singularly or a combination of hazards as the individual situation may require. The paper ends with a brief discussion of some of the alternative action options available to the owner/operator of a facility and the means by which an optimum acceptable risk decision can be crafted.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleAcceptable Risk: A Need for Periodic Review
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume1
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleNatural Hazards Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:3(180)
dc.treeNatural Hazards Review:;2000:;Volume ( 001 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record