Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarla S. Prater
dc.contributor.authorMichael K. Lindell
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:31:15Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:31:15Z
dc.date.copyrightMay 2000
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291527-6988%282000%291%3A2%2873%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/54623
dc.description.abstractThe formulation, adoption, and implementation of mitigation measures is an intensely political process that hazards professionals need to understand if they are to be effective in reducing community hazard vulnerability. We describe the process by which either focusing events such as disasters, or policy entrepreneurs such as involved professionals, can frame hazard mitigation as a salient issue on the community agenda. In addition, we discuss the demands of policy formulation, particularly the importance of mobilizing a constituency for hazard mitigation among affected stakeholders in the community. Finally, we conclude by showing how a widely used model of policy implementation reveals critical features that community hazard mitigation policies must have if they are to be implemented successfully by administrative bureaucracies.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titlePolitics of Hazard Mitigation
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume1
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleNatural Hazards Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(73)
dc.treeNatural Hazards Review:;2000:;Volume ( 001 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record