Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohn H. Sorensen
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:31:15Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:31:15Z
dc.date.copyrightMay 2000
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291527-6988%282000%291%3A2%28119%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/54617
dc.description.abstractThe United States has no comprehensive national warning strategy that covers all hazards in all places. Instead, public warning practices are decentralized across different governments and the private sector. Uneven preparedness to issue warnings exists across local communities; hence, people are unevenly protected from the surprise onset of natural disasters. Without changes in this situation, inequalities will grow larger, and the gains made in saving lives over the past decades may well be reversed. Since the first assessment of research on natural hazards was completed in 1975, there have been significant improvements in forecasts and warnings for some hazards but only marginal improvements for others. Forecasts for floods, hurricanes, and volcanic eruptions have improved most significantly, and public dissemination of warnings has improved the most for hurricanes. However, a 100% reliable warning system does not exist for any hazard.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleHazard Warning Systems: Review of 20 Years of Progress
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume1
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleNatural Hazards Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(119)
dc.treeNatural Hazards Review:;2000:;Volume ( 001 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record