Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJames E. Smith Jr.
dc.contributor.authorRao Y. Surampalli
dc.contributor.authorRobert S. Reimers
dc.contributor.authorR. D. Tyagi
dc.contributor.authorBindu N. Lohani
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:30:05Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:30:05Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 2008
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291090-025x%282008%2912%3A1%2810%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/53885
dc.description.abstractThis paper reviews the current United States sewage sludge disinfection regulations and their associated practices; discusses the limitations of the practices; the criteria employed in evaluating a new (innovative or alternative) disinfection process, and notes both some processes recently evaluated and ones evaluated. The United States regulations are designed to protect human health by minimizing the contact of humans with pathogenic microorganisms. Two types of disinfection processes are employed. Processes like pasteurization are employed to reduce pathogens below their analytical detection limits, while processes like anaerobic digestion are combined with requirements for organic matter reduction and access restrictions. Issues with the present disinfection alternatives such as their only being concerned with the presence or absence of certain pathogens like enteric viruses or
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleDisinfection Processes and Stability Refinements to Biosolids Treatment Technologies
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume12
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titlePractice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2008)12:1(10)
dc.treePractice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management:;2008:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record