Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKu-Fan Chen
dc.contributor.authorLong-Chuan Wu
dc.contributor.authorChih-Ming Kao
dc.contributor.authorC. C. Gordon Yang
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:29:55Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:29:55Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 2004
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291090-025x%282004%298%3A2%2899%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/53761
dc.description.abstractRisk-based corrective action (RBCA) has been becoming an accepted approach for the remediation of contaminated sites. This paper described the application of four different risk assessment approaches, including the North Carolina risk analysis framework (Framework), Illinois tiered approach to correction objectives, RBCA tool kit for chemical releases (RBCA tool kit), and exposure and risk assessment decision support system, to conduct a risk evaluation task and demonstrate the application strategy at a fuel-oil spill site. After the risk evaluation processes, the soil and groundwater remediation goals for target compounds (total petroleum hydrocarbon, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes) were determined. The calculated remediation levels met with the requirements for minimum target risk levels (i.e., cancer risk of
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleApplication of Health Risk Assessment to Derive Cleanup Levels at a Fuel-Oil Spill Site
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume8
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titlePractice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2004)8:2(99)
dc.treePractice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management:;2004:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record