Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPaul D. Bennett
dc.contributor.authorBrad Brumbach
dc.contributor.authorTyrone W. Farmer
dc.contributor.authorPreston L. Funkhouser IV
dc.contributor.authorAllen W. Hatheway
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:29:39Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:29:39Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 1999
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291090-025x%281999%293%3A1%2823%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/53585
dc.description.abstractSelection of remedy for uncontrolled hazardous waste sites involves comparisons of various technological approaches for minimization of threats and achievement of cleanup action levels. Approaches specified in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (SUPERFUND Law) National Contingency Plan (40 CFR 300) are broadly labeled as actions, alternatives, and technologies. We have found considerable perplexity in denoting the rank-hierarchy of these approaches and have developed a classification system for dealing with the totality of available measures for consideration in selection of remedy.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleRemedy Selection for Cleanup of Uncontrolled Waste Sites
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume3
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titlePractice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(1999)3:1(23)
dc.treePractice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management:;1999:;Volume ( 003 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record