Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliam J. Hansen
dc.contributor.authorKenneth D. Orth
dc.contributor.authorRidgley K. Robinson
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:29:35Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:29:35Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 1998
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291090-025x%281998%292%3A1%288%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/53555
dc.description.abstractAn approach is presented for evaluating site-specific or multisite alternative environmental remedies that involve nonmonetary benefits. After discussing problems that currently preclude the use of benefit-cost analysis for such evaluation, the analytical approaches of cost effectiveness and incremental cost analyses are presented, including discussion of data requirements, procedures for application, and guidelines for interpreting results to inform decision making. The analyses and interpretation of their results are illustrated with a hypothetical application, based on data from an actual case study involving the cleanup of contaminated underground storage tanks, using a software program called ECO-EASY.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleCost Effectiveness and Incremental Cost Analyses: Alternative to Benefit-Cost Analysis for Environmental Remediation Projects
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume2
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titlePractice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(1998)2:1(8)
dc.treePractice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management:;1998:;Volume ( 002 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record