Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavid Trejo
dc.contributor.authorKenneth Reinschmidt
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:25:33Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:25:33Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 2007
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291084-0702%282007%2912%3A1%2831%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/50991
dc.description.abstractA substantial amount of research has been performed on the use of high performance construction materials and their effects on the anticipated frequency of maintenance and on the time to repair or replacement. Practical implementation of this work has been limited due to the lack of useable methods and information on the life-cycle costs and benefits of alternative approaches in the preliminary design stages of projects, when decisions regarding materials selection are typically made. The lack of simple methods for making quick life-cycle economic comparisons typically results in the use of conventional materials because their impact on performance is well known, even though high-performance materials may actually be more cost effective. This paper identifies the most significant parameters for evaluating the time to corrosion of reinforced concrete structures.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleJustifying Materials Selection for Reinforced Concrete Structures. I: Sensitivity Analysis
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume12
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:1(31)
dc.treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2007:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record