Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSrinivas Aluri
dc.contributor.authorChandrashekar Jinka
dc.contributor.authorHota V. GangaRao
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:25:24Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:25:24Z
dc.date.copyrightNovember 2005
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291084-0702%282005%2910%3A6%28722%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/50877
dc.description.abstractFiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composite bridge decks are gaining the attention of bridge owners because of their light self-weight, corrosion resistance, and ease of installation. Constructed Facilities Center at West Virginia University working with the Federal Highway Administration and West Virginia Department of Transportation has developed three different FRP decking systems and installed several FRP deck bridges in West Virginia. These FRP bridge decks are lighter in weight than comparable concrete systems and therefore their dynamic performance is equally as important as their static performance. In the current study dynamic tests were performed on three FRP deck bridges, namely, Katy Truss Bridge, Market Street Bridge, and Laurel Lick Bridge, in the state of West Virginia. The dynamic response parameters evaluated for the three bridges include dynamic load allowance (DLA) factors, natural frequencies, damping ratios, and deck accelerations caused by moving test trucks. It was found that the DLA factors for Katy Truss and Market Street bridges are within the AASHTO 1998 LRFD specifications, but the deck accelerations were found to be high for both these bridges. DLA factors for Laurel Lick bridge were found to be as high as 93% against the typical design value of 33%; however absolute deck stress induced by vehicle loads is less than 10% of the deck ultimate stress.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleDynamic Response of Three Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite Bridges
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume10
dc.journal.issue6
dc.journal.titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:6(722)
dc.treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2005:;Volume ( 010 ):;issue: 006
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record