| dc.contributor.author | Makarand Hastak | |
| dc.contributor.author | Amir Mirmiran | |
| dc.contributor.author | Richard Miller | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ronak Shah | |
| dc.contributor.author | Reid Castrodale | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:25:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-08T21:25:07Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | September 2003 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
| dc.identifier.other | %28asce%291084-0702%282003%298%3A5%28267%29.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/50689 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Precast bridges are often constructed as single span for dead load, but continuous for live load. A diaphragm connection is provided for negative moment continuity. However, the connection may also be subjected to positive moments due to time-dependent effects. Because these moments may be large enough to damage the diaphragm or even the girders, a positive moment connection is often provided. This paper reports on a study to determine the types of positive moment connections used across the country and to identify potential problems with these types of connections. A questionnaire survey was conducted to assess the state of practice for precast prestressed concrete bridges made continuous. The survey provides valuable information on this type of bridge and updates a previous survey on this subject. | |
| dc.publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| dc.title | State of Practice for Positive Moment Connections in Prestressed Concrete Girders Made Continuous | |
| dc.type | Journal Paper | |
| dc.journal.volume | 8 | |
| dc.journal.issue | 5 | |
| dc.journal.title | Journal of Bridge Engineering | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:5(267) | |
| dc.tree | Journal of Bridge Engineering:;2003:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 005 | |
| dc.contenttype | Fulltext | |