• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Bridge Rating with Consideration for Fatigue Damage from Overloads

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28asce%291084-0702%282000%295%3A3%28259%29.pdf (88.21Kb)
    Date
    2000
    Author
    Jamshid Mohammadi
    Ramakishna Polepeddi
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This paper presents a proposed rating model that incorporates the fatigue damaging effects of overloads. This is achieved by introducing a “fatigue index” in the rating equation. The index, which appears in the form of a correction factor in the rating equation, is intended as a means to reduce the rating value computed for a bridge in cases where the damage from overloads is expected to be significant. The use of this index by itself does not impose any upper limit on the total number of overloads that may annually be permitted on a bridge. However, because the use of the index will result in a lower rating value than those from current equations, it is expected that a certain number of overloads will ultimately be disallowed. This provides for a built-in mechanism that will eventually result in lower fatigue damage to highway bridges resulting from overloads. In developing the model, typical records of overloads were acquired and used in bridge structural analyses to determine the damaging effect of overloads. The study on five bridges showed that fatigue damage from overloads can use up about 3.5% of fatigue life over a 25-year period if the overload occurrences remain at the current level. The use of the proposed index is in line with this amount of fatigue damage. This percentage is rather low and may not, in fact, be critical for most bridges over a 25-year period. However for older bridges, this percentage of fatigue life consumption may become important. Many such bridges were designed for a lower gross truck weight than what is used today for bridge design. Some of these bridges are located along feeder ramps and must carry loads in excess of 356 kN (80 kip) in an overload situation. For this group of bridges, it may be important to consider imposing a limit on the amount of fatigue damage resulting from frequent overloads. However, additional studies on a larger pool of bridges will be needed to establish a baseline for a maximum percentage fatigue life that can be used for overload permits.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/50500
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV