Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorH. R. Hamilton, III
dc.contributor.authorJ. E. Breen
dc.contributor.authorK. H. Frank
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:24:40Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:24:40Z
dc.date.copyrightMay 1998
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291084-0702%281998%293%3A2%2872%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/50394
dc.description.abstractThis paper is the second of two companion papers that cover the results of corrosion and structural testing of eight large-scale stay cable specimens. Four of the specimens had the traditional system of portland cement (PC) grout and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) sheathing, while the other four specimens used improved protection systems such as epoxy-coated, galvanized, greased, and sheathed strands, or a grout improved with silica fume. A unique accelerated corrosion testing technique developed for bridge stay cables is also described. The traditional system of corrosion protection broke down almost immediately after the initiation of the accelerated corrosion test, while the improved corrosion protection systems provided far better corrosion protection than the traditional system. However, some problems were encountered with the improved corrosion protection systems that are of interest.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleBridge Stay Cable Corrosion Protection. II: Accelerated Corrosion Tests
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume3
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1998)3:2(72)
dc.treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;1998:;Volume ( 003 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record