Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorG. Wei
dc.contributor.authorD. E. Claridge
dc.contributor.authorW. D. Turner
dc.contributor.authorM. Liu
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:22:08Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:22:08Z
dc.date.copyrightSeptember 2005
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291076-0431%282005%2911%3A3%2876%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/48720
dc.description.abstractTo improve system efficiency under part-load conditions, the supply air temperature set point for a single-duct constant air volume air handling unit (AHU) system is often reset based on either return air temperature or outside air temperature. Both reset strategies make engineering sense as long as the reset schedules are reasonable. Quite often the decision to use one over the other is made with the assumption that they will both achieve some energy savings. However, the impact of these two strategies on AHU energy consumption could be very different. An in-depth analysis and comparison of these two commonly used supply air temperature reset strategies for a single-duct constant air volume system is presented in this paper. It is shown that the reset strategy based on outside air temperature is inherently better than that based on return air temperature, with lower energy consumption and improved building comfort level.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleChoosing the Right Parameter for Single-Duct Constant Air Volume System Supply Air Temperature Reset
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume11
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2005)11:3(76)
dc.treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2005:;Volume ( 011 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record