Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorW. K. Chow
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:22:01Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:22:01Z
dc.date.copyrightDecember 2002
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291076-0431%282002%298%3A4%28116%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/48652
dc.description.abstractA Fire Safety Ranking System (EB-FSRS) is proposed for assessing the fire safety provisions in existing high-rise nonresidential buildings in Hong Kong. The objective is to investigate how far the fire safety provisions in those existing buildings deviate from the expectation of new codes. Suitable fire safety management can then be worked out in the transition period, based on the scores. Local fire codes were reviewed first to decide what should be the attributes and their weightings. From the reviewing results, three groups of attributes were proposed in the EB-FSRS. These are the passive building construction, active fire protection systems (fire services installation), and key risk parameters, all following the local fire safety requirements. The concept is similar to those equivalent concepts on fire safety parameters of the National Fire Protection Association–Fire Safety Evaluation System (NFPA-FSES). But the EB-FSRS is not a “trade-off” exercise. Thirty-seven old high-rise buildings were rated by studying their architectural features, interior details, and fire safety provisions. Scores under EB-FSES and NFPA-FSES are also compared.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleProposed Fire Safety Ranking System EB-FSRS for Existing High-Rise Nonresidential Buildings in Hong Kong
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume8
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2002)8:4(116)
dc.treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2002:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record