Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRichard H. McCuen
dc.contributor.authorGulsah Akar
dc.contributor.authorIan A. Gifford
dc.contributor.authorDeepa Srikantaiah
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:58Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:20:58Z
dc.date.copyrightOctober 2009
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%282009%29135%3A4%28153%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47972
dc.description.abstractCommunication between advisees and their research advisers while they are in graduate school has a major impact on their academic and research performance. A model of communication process was verified using results from a poll of more than 100 engineering graduate students. Major findings from the results and analyses include that advisees appreciate an adviser’s concern, pressure, and timely feedback. However, graduate students would like their advisers to be more sensitive to their lack of technical knowledge. Feedback from the advisee to the adviser can increase the likelihood of effective communication. In addition, advisers need to better guide their students in career building aspects during the Ph.D. process (e.g., submitting papers to journals). Language differences do not appear to be significant barrier to effective communication. An array of recommendations for improving adviser-advisee communication is provided.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleRecommendations for Improving Graduate Adviser-Advisee Communication
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume135
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2009)135:4(153)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2009:;Volume ( 135 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record