Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDaniel R. Lynch
dc.contributor.authorJeffrey S. Russell
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:57Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:20:57Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 2009
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%282009%29135%3A1%2831%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47955
dc.description.abstractThe American Society of Civil Engineers is asserting an increasingly broad and deep body of knowledge (BOK) that reflects contemporary expectations for professional leadership. The BOK is to be fulfilled with a combination of formal education and practical experience. The formal education part includes renewed emphasis on an integrated base of liberal learning, greater technical breadth, specific professional preparation, and mastery of a specialization. Important elements of cognitive development are “assigned” to prelicensure experience. Among these are several learning outcomes critical to realizing the announced vision of the professional for the current century. The current system of prelicensure experience is inadequate and will not perform without structural change. The shortfall lies in the arrangements for fulfilling and validating specific learning outcomes beyond the university. The status quo in engineering is reviewed and compared with other professions. A model program is sketched in terms of specifications and some suggested actions.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleExperiential Learning in Engineering Practice
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume135
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2009)135:1(31)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2009:;Volume ( 135 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record