Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRichard N. M. Anderson
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:55Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:20:55Z
dc.date.copyrightJuly 2008
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%282008%29134%3A3%28309%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47935
dc.description.abstractGood ideas are often overtaken by great events. That happened to adjudication. Originally envisaged as a single concept applying across the United Kingdom, it has been overtaken by more significant constitutional change. This paper takes a look at that process. Something of a parallel could perhaps be drawn with the individual states in the United States each introducing a similar form of legislation. The possibility exists, of course, of each area adopting a different approach but the indications are that certain communality is developing in adjudication and it is, perhaps, a measure of the success of the concept of adjudication that it is being voluntarily adopted in other dependency areas such as the Isle of Man.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleAdjudication in the United Kingdom: Constitutional Implications
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume134
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:3(309)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2008:;Volume ( 134 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record