U.S. Evidence Laws and Their Influence on Mold Litigation Outcomes

dc.contributor.author	Linda Thomas-Mobley
dc.date.accessioned	2017-05-08T21:20:50Z
dc.date.available	2017-05-08T21:20:50Z
dc.date.copyright	October 2007
dc.date.issued	2007
dc.identifier.other	%28asce%291052-3928%282007%29133%3A4%28352%29.pdf
dc.identifier.uri	http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47883
dc.description.abstract	The architectural/engineering/construction (AEC) industry has been inundated with disputes concerning excessive mold growth that arose from improper construction or maintenance of the built environment. Despite scientific evidence that shows that exposure to so-called toxic molds does not produce illness, costly legal disputes arise. This paper focuses on instances in which the outcome of mold lawsuits hinged on the jurisdiction
dc.publisher	American Society of Civil Engineers
dc.title	U.S. Evidence Laws and Their Influence on Mold Litigation Outcomes
dc.type	Journal Paper
dc.journal.volume	133
dc.journal.issue	4
dc.journal.title	Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi	10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:4(352)
dc.tree	Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttype	Fulltext