Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJames Trevelyan
dc.contributor.authorSabbia Tilli
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:50Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:20:50Z
dc.date.copyrightOctober 2007
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%282007%29133%3A4%28300%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47877
dc.description.abstractEngineering literature mostly focuses on the “objects” and techniques that interest engineers: there are only a few accounts of the people that do engineering work and what that work actually involves. The relevant literature contributes a combination of personal opinion, anecdotal reports, and empirical evidence from quantitative and a few qualitative surveys. Most of the empirical research provides only indirect and limited evidence on engineering work as it is practiced because the survey questions seem to be based on preconceived notions of engineering work. Almost all the papers in the literature that refer to engineering practice aim to provide evidence for changing engineering education or evidence to support a particular set of engineering competencies. From these narrow objectives we can learn a little about engineering work. More empirical evidence is needed before we can work towards a comprehensive understanding, let alone improvement of engineering working methods and practices.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titlePublished Research on Engineering Work
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume133
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:4(300)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record