Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorK. W. Chau
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:47Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:20:47Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 2007
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%282007%29133%3A2%28143%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47850
dc.description.abstractResolving construction disputes using an adversarial approach is considered to be in opposition of the maintenance of a harmonious relationship between two parties. The modern arbitration process may emulate the litigation proceeding leading to delay and cost escalation. During the past decade, the Hong Kong Government has implemented a mediation clause as an alternative mode for settlement of construction disputes. In this paper, the experience and insight into resolving construction disputes by integrating mediation and then arbitration in Hong Kong are highlighted. The state-of-the-art modern mediation process and its philosophical origins are reviewed. The shortcomings of the present system are pinpointed. The success of the adjudication now practiced in the United Kingdom may suggest that there is a place for another process of dispute resolution, which may help improve the situation. The prospect of the proposed mediation/adjudication and then arbitration mechanism is discussed with particular reference to the construction industry in Hong Kong.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleInsight into Resolving Construction Disputes by Mediation/Adjudication in Hong Kong
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume133
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:2(143)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record